Journalist Ihor Semyon shared the details of the decision to hold a "tournament of four" to replace Dnipro-1 in the Ukrainian Premier League.
"This is how the clubs voted:
"Veres vs: "Minaj"
"Vorskla": abstained
"Dynamo": tournament of four
"Zorya": "Minaj"
"Ingulets": "Minaj"
Karpaty: abstained
Kolos: tournament of four
Kryvbas: "Minaj"
LNZ: "Minaj"
Obolon: "Minaj"
"Alexandria": tournament of four
"Polissya": "Minaj
Rukh: tournament of four
Chornomorets: tournament of four
Shakhtar vs: "Minaj"
Total result: 8 clubs supported Minaj; five clubs supported the tournament of four; two clubs abstained.
From the very beginning, the organizers were determined to have a "final four" to replace Dnipro-1. The clubs' vote is a tribute to necessity. They voted because they had to. But the result, as we can see, was not taken into account. As soon as it became known that Dnipro-1 would not play, the organizers' priority idea was the Final Four. Three teams immediately agreed to it, one did not, but they decided to "push" it through. Minaj was not "humble," as the UAF hoped, but he could not do much.
Now the state of the club, which was voted for by the majority, is something like devastation. In the process of preparing for the mini-tournament, we will have to take into account not only game, personnel, tactical, logistical, organizational nuances (they want to hold the mini-tournament in Kyiv), but also psychological ones," Semion wrote on Telegram.
