Mikhail Spivakovsky: “I know that Skripnik had a different list of newcomers”

TaToTake host Mikhail Spivakovsky shared his opinion on the reasons for the failure of Viktor Skripnik's team. According to the journalist, despite the good financial conditions at Vorskla, the head coach does not influence the personnel policy.

Victor Skripnik

“Let's take the match between Metallist and Vorskla. Can Skrypnyk think that the goalkeeper of the national team Riznyk cannot fix the ball. There was no attack on the goalkeeper. Second episode. Stepanyuk and Kravchuk stopped, Kaplienko makes a dash for 35 meters and passes to Pryadun. Yavorsky standing nearby, who is nearby and has been playing for 15 years in the Premier League, does not see where the transfer will go. The spinner scores from the sand pit.

Third episode: Yavorsky and Chesnakov played for two, about 600 matches in the Premier League. And they don't know that there is no offside after the out. Kharkiv team scored in this episode, it was done by the same Pryadun. How can I do that?

Everyone says that Skrypnyk's composition is not what he would like. Now Vorskla, in financial terms, is the most stable club of the teams, conditionally, of the second tier. As far as I know, Skripnik had a different list of newcomers. Who and what prevents you from bringing at least one defender of Abu-Khanna's level to the team? Who's stopping you from bringing him footballers for his rhombus? This is a very good question.

We can congratulate Viktor Skrypnyk for joining the club of coaches who join a team where he cannot build the football he wants to play. He must build football from the material that is available.

As they say, "Roman Sanjar's club". Roman Sanzhar said every six months: Where are my players? And you have new players,” they answered him,” Spivakovsky said.

Comment