"Tsygankov received a card for no reason", - the referee's analysis of the match "Dynamo" - "Olexandria" from the referee of FIF

In the comments of 1927.kiev.ua, the well-known referee Myroslav Stupar evaluated the refereeing in the match of the 12th round of the championship of Ukraine "Dynamo" - "Olexandria".

— The game "Dynamo" - "Alexandria" was key in this round. Both teams are fighting for prize places, so an arbitrator should be appointed to judge such a confrontation. Despite the fact that Panchyshyn has a good physique and physical training, he moves well, but he makes inadequate decisions. You can miss the decisions that happened throughout the match - they didn't have a huge impact on the game, but the moment in the 70th minute is really worth noting. Vanat passed a pass to Tsygankov, he received the ball, turned around and was pulled by Baboglo by the T-shirt so that he fell on his back. A strange decision - a yellow card for simulating Tsygankov. Despite the fact that Panchyshyn saw this moment.

Subsequently, there was the fall of Vanat in a fight with Tsurikov in the penalty area - the simulation of the Dynamo player is obvious. However, there is no yellow and the game was continued. That is, in the episode where a penalty should have been awarded, Panchyshyn, on the contrary, showed a yellow card, and at the moment when he should have shown a warning for simulation, this was not done.

Perhaps he understood that Tsygankov's fall was a clear violation and Viktor received a yellow card for no reason, because of which he felt guilty. With all this in mind, he didn't give Vanatu a booking for diving, which would have been his first, and was forced to show a warning a few minutes later for a rough tackle, which would have been his second yellow card.

Often, during the game, referees think about their previous decision - whether it was right or not - and make the following mistakes. It all depends on psychology. You won't get anywhere.

It is possible to note the actions of the referees when Lonwijk scored a goal. Vanat was in a passive offside position, but the goal was scored. His actions did not affect the resolution of the moment, Stupar said.