Myroslav Stupar: "Grigorchuk appealed to the judge on the case"

Myroslav Stupar, a well-known referee in the past, in a commentary for 1927.kiev.ua, assessed the refereeing in the match of the 4th round of the Ukrainian championship between Chornomorets and Dynamo (3:2).

Miroslav Stupar

- There are no particular complaints about the refereeing, as was the case in previous matches - Dnipro-1 vs Obolon, for example. Hryhorchuk appealed to the referee, but he did it in a professional manner. There were minor flaws in the refereeing, but the VAR was present at the match and nothing serious was missed.

Speaking about individual moments, Dubinchak's fall in the 68th minute during a shot was not a reason for an eleven-metre penalty, as Balakin awarded to Obolon. There are no questions about Syrota's sending off either. The Dynamo defender received a second yellow card out of the blue. There were no more moments to consider the refereeing. "As for the game, the desire to win against Chornomorets was very noticeable, and Dynamo wanted to win at a level that they don't have yet," Myroslav Ivanovych noted.

0 комментариев
Best comment
  • Andrey Bogushevsky(bam73) - Эксперт
    21.08.2023 18:05
    Правило 12 Правил игры в футбол.
    ............Запасной или заменённый игрок, тренер или работник клуба получает предупреждение с показом жёлтой карточки, в случае, если он:
    виновен в неспортивном поведении;
    словом или действием демонстрирует несогласие с решением судьи;
    умышленно затягивает возобновление игры.
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    "Григорчук апеллировал к судье, но делал это по делу. "
    То есть "словом или действием демонстрирует несогласие с решением судьи." Где карточка?
    • 5
Comment