Oleg Fedorchuk: "When playing with his head, Guerrero reminds me of Rebrov"

Famous Ukrainian coach and authoritative expert Oleh Fedorchuk analyzed which of the two strikers of Dynamo Kyiv - Vladyslav Supryaha (currently on loan from Zorya) and Eduardo Guerrero - is the best.

Prospects.

- Both players have problems in their careers. Guerrero is only 24, and he has already changed many teams. Supryaga's situation is a bit similar. Both players had bright flashes. Both are Aquarius, but they have different temperaments.

Guerrero is more versatile than Supryaha. Eduardo can act from deep and on the wing. Vlad, in turn, is dependent on his partners and the game on him.

Evaluation: Guerrero - 4/5, Supryaga - 3/5.

Speed.

- Supryaga may be superior in terms of distance speed, but Guerrero has a higher speed with the ball and can explode at short range.

Rating: Guerrero - 5/5 Supryag - 4/5.

Kicking.

- Supryaga has a well-placed shot. In turn, Guerrero is good with both feet, but the Panamanian's shots are not as powerful as Supryaga's, but more falling. He can hit it so hard that it will be difficult for the goalkeeper to react. Vlad relies more on strength. In the Second League, he scored a lot of goals from shots that pierced the goalkeeper.

Rating: Guerrero - 5/5 Supryaga - 3.5/5.

Heading skills.

- Here Guerrero reminds me more of Rebrov, who was small in stature but scored a lot with his head. Jumping, coordination, aggression is there.

Rating: Guerrero - 4/5, Suprjaga - 3/5.

Technique.

- Guerrero likes to play from the flank, easily changes the pace to the direction of movement. Very good to use in the press. He runs a lot, but without aggression.

Rating: Guerrero - 5/5 Supryaga - 3.5/5.

Dribbling

- Guerrero is good on the dribble. It is very difficult for defenders to play against him, which cannot be said about Supryaga.

Rating: Guerrero - 5/5 Supryaga - 3.5/5.

Playing in space

- Supryaha is better in this aspect. We could see this in Dnipro-1 and Petrakov's team. At Dynamo, he had a hard time with it. Guerrero works more in the third zone, closer to the goal.

Rating: Guerrero - 3/5 Supryaga - 5/5.

Playing on the counterattack

- In such a game, Supryaha feels like a fish out of water. Running is the best thing he knows how to do, with a wide step.

Positional play

- If you need to change the pace or direction, Supryaga may lack coordination. Guerrero is better suited to work in the final third and contact work.

Rating: Guerrero - 4/5, Supryaga - 5/5.

Endurance.

- In this aspect, it is difficult to evaluate Supryaga, who plays very little time. The fact that Guerrero often doesn't finish matches indicates that his physical condition is not the best either.

Rating: Guerrero - 3/5, Supryaga - 3/5.

Physical strength

- In general, both players are well developed physically. There are strikers who play with skill, and Supryaga and Guerrero play with physicality.

Rating: Guerrero - 4.5/5, Supryaga - 4/5.

Aggression.

- Supryaha is more calm, and you don't know when Guerrero might explode. To what extent are Dynamo ready to work with players of a difficult character after Gerson Rodriguez? In this regard, Shovkovsky is not to be envied.

Rating: Guerrero - 4/5, Supryaga - 3/5.

Universalism.

- Supryaga did not turn out to be a universalist, so I'm betting on Guerrero.

Rating: Guerrero - 5/5, Harness - 3/5.

Game thinking

- On their best day, both players can come up with something original.

Rating: Guerrero - 4/5, Supryaga - 4/5.

Bottom Line.

- This exchange is a win-win for both players. Guerrero, if he plays well in the Europa League, will help both himself and the club get a good offer and make good money. Supryaha faces a difficult task - to revive his career, competing with Budkivsky for a place in the first team.

Oleksandr Karpenko