Oleg Fedorchuk: «It was not only Dubinchak who faltered. Shaparenko and Voloshin also played very nervously»

Famous Ukrainian coach and authoritative expert Oleg Fedorchuk assessed the performance of each of the Kyiv Dynamo players in the match of the 4th round of the main stage of the Europa League against Hungarian Ferencvaros (0:4), which took place last Thursday in Hamburg.

Georgiy Bushchan — 7.0

— Bushchan played well, but he lacked leadership actions regarding the actions of the defense players. For a modern goalkeeper, this is necessary. After conceding a goal, he became disheartened and started to fall apart, but this is definitely his best game of the year.

Vladislav Dubinchak — 4.0

— It was not only he who faltered. It was noticeable that both Shaparenko and Dubinchak and Voloshin played very nervously. But the foul that led to the red card was absolutely unnecessary. Dubinchak let the team down significantly. I think this dismissal will affect his future career.

Taras Mikhavko — 5.5

— Mikhavko and Bilovar play too early in the starting lineup, but they are lucky that they can gain experience in such matches. Well, and they need to build muscle; it does not have to be like in Popov, but he should significantly improve in this area.

Christian Bilovar — 6.0

— If we do not take into account that mistake when he lost a one-on-one situation, then this was his best game. But it would be paradoxical if the defense and goalkeeper played well, but the team lost 0:4.

Oleksandr Karavayev — 6.5

— Karavayev plays very inspired, but only in attack. If he played at least 50% with that intensity in defense, he would be one of the best players. Karavayev is an experienced player who can make a difference, for example, like in the match against Shakhtar. He could also score against Ferencvaros, but unfortunately, he was off target.

Volodymyr Brazhko — 6.5

— He sometimes takes too many risks in attacking play. Reliability was lacking from Brazhko. A large number of shots from Ferencvaros from medium distance is also on his conscience. After the injury he received in the national team, Brazhko has slightly declined.

Mykola Shaparenko — 6.5

— Too many nerves; he needs to play more cool-headedly. It seems to me that this saga of his probable transfer to a European club played its negative role. I hope I am wrong since Shaparenko is a very good player who can progress. By the way, Sudakov has the same problem. His words about critics? Sudakov's game is a criticism itself. They simply expect more from him and Shaparenko.

Vitaliy Buyalsky — no rating

— In his 17 minutes, he earned the title of one of the best players in the match, but I do not want to rate him since he really spent little time on the field and did not have time to stand out with result-oriented actions. Buyalsky is not one of those players who leads the team and takes on the responsibility. His strengths are his technique, creativity, space search, and subtle actions.

Vitaliy on the field is a free artist, like Rembrandt. (Smiles). If we compare him with other players, he is like the Ukrainian Baggio, Del Piero. But because Buyalsky is a very dependent player, he was the one substituted.

Vladislav Kabayev — 6.5

— Kabayev made a fatal mistake, which led to a conceded goal, and after that, he completely stopped playing. Although in the first half he was one of the best players, this mistake negated his good performance.

Nazar Voloshin — 6.0

— Voloshin is a player who needs space to use his high speed. He lacks muscle and strength.

Vladislav Vanat — 5.5

— The way Vanat played this game, it would have been better to substitute him in the 17th minute instead of Buyalsky. I hoped that Vlad would play for two, but no—he also acted as if there were no red cards. More dirty work needed to be done instead of waiting for a moment. And he never got it.

— What can you say about the Dynamo players who came on as substitutes in this match?

— Yevcharenko (6.0) is behind Dubinchak in defensive actions and lacks aggression. He came on and did nothing wrong, but did not help the team significantly. Rubchinsky has good potential—he is the future of Dynamo. In a year or two, he will be a midfielder who leads the game.

Bragar is a successful transfer for Kyiv. I really like him. He has a good set of characteristics, and besides, he is versatile. But he still needs to adapt to the level of Dynamo, although his potential is high.

Vladislav Lyustovansky