Journalist Mykhailo Spivakovsky analyzed Dynamo's 0-2 defeat to Ingulets on the TaToTake program.
Mykhailo Spivakovsky"In case anyone has forgotten, Lucescu's Dynamo are fruitless against schemes with three central defenders. And this formation is Kovalets' favorite. The weakness of the leader was superimposed on the strength of the underdog. Everything is simple. Hence the complete impotence of Kyiv in the final third. There were all the conditions for the guests' vertical attacks. In such circumstances, Dynamo's playmakers are the supporters. They were met very aggressively, taking the ball away and cutting it with the first pass like a Prague cake. That is, Sydorchuk and Shepelev were left behind the pace of the opponent's attack.
This might not have been a global catastrophe if not for the very high positions of the laterals - Karavaev and Dubinchak. An endless abyss opened up behind them. Where Ingulets' attacking group ran into, respectively. Surprisingly, Lucescu's team not only suffered in the final third, it was completely unprepared for losses.
The pair of central defenders Popov and Dyachuk is not even a carvalol. It is a continuous pain and suffering. The second goal was entirely Popov's. And he also took part in the first one. And all this against the backdrop of Ingulets' powerful veteran Sitalo. There is a feeling that Dynamo has a real problem with physical fitness. It's not about endurance, but about lightness. Or rather, the lack of it. There is no explosive work, no change of pace. The bench does not solve anything in the absence of structure. A breath of fresh air was a two-minute period from the 35th to the 37th minute, when Ingulets cut back and gave Vanat the freedom to run. When his fresh legs were supported by Buyalsky's head, Kyiv created at least something. But as a result, with 71% of the ball possession, Dynamo lost to the opponent in terms of shots on goal," Spivakovsky said.
