Chelsea fans, in light of poor results and the ongoing silence, are increasingly proposing various theories as to why no one is talking about the results of the B sample of Mykhailo Mudryk. Given that the English club did not strengthen the left winger position in the winter transfer window (there were talks about a nearly finalized transfer of Garnacho), plus the unexpected transfer of Joao Felix (who could have also played on the left) to Milan, everyone is confident that the club believes in Mudryk’s innocence. Yesterday's news that the Ukrainian winger remains on Chelsea's roster for the Conference League only confirmed fans' opinions about good news regarding Mudryk.
Mykhailo MudrykTheSkyIsBlue: You all know me and know where I work. I can only share one of the versions that is popular among Chelsea. Perhaps tomorrow I will be asked to delete this post, but this silence is killing all the fans, I understand this perfectly. So, one of the versions is that Mudryk has long been deemed innocent. The B sample has long been opened, and it is negative. But the problem lies in why the A sample was positive. There are suspicions that someone set Mudryk up. Russians, former agents, his ex-girlfriend - it doesn't matter right now. Because in such schemes, a laboratory worker is involved, and he did this by taking money from someone. Anyone who knows how A and B samples are opened will understand why everyone was advising the Ukrainian not to open the B sample. Because no one believed that Mudryk would agree to this, as he could agree to admit guilt and reduce his suspension. But this is not the essence of the version.
The point is that Mudryk can only be justified if those responsible acknowledge that laboratory workers can be bribed. And that will open a Pandora's box. This is an international scandal that would harm all of Great Britain. The true story about Mudryk may shock the football world. So negotiations are ongoing. Chelsea will promise some serious benefits, and he will remain silent about Mudryk. In the best case, the Ukrainian will be made partially guilty and allowed to play in the spring. In the worst case, Mudryk will be destroyed to cover up any traces, and Chelsea will be helped to come to terms with this. Given the seriousness of the matter, information is not leaked to insiders as it usually is. I am in no way claiming this is true. I'm sure I wrote this in vain. But you will have little time to read this and some information to ponder.
Jimmy: The more the club remains silent about the situation with Mudryk, the stranger the theories I read from people who are somehow connected to Chelsea. It seems that everyone is confused and unsure if they can say anything about Mudryk at all. And it doesn't seem like the way someone doesn't want to talk about a criminal. It seems like the club feels guilty towards the player, which is why they are afraid to look him in the eye.
Pound: Obviously, no one reveals the results of the B sample for weeks, or however long this has been going on. The B sample has long been open. If Mudryk were guilty, we would already be talking about how deserved his suspension is for 2 or 4 years, as is usually the case in such instances. Therefore, something strange is happening that they are trying to hide from us. The question is why and for what?
NoFat: I read Ben Jacobs' post stating that they want to declare Mudryk guilty even if the B sample is negative, and I understood that this is an attempt from someone at the club to gently pressure the anti-doping committee. It is clear that this will outrage fans, so it would be a risky step. But the question is, how can you declare a person guilty if they are innocent? And why do it?
Hershel: The winter transfer window has closed. What do we have? Chelsea decided not to sign a left winger, even though this position is weak for us. Chelsea loaned Joao Felix to Milan at the last moment. Chelsea kept Mudryk on the roster for the Conference League. And I currently do not mean that everything hinges on the Ukrainian player. I want to say that the behavior of the key people at the club recently looks strange. Very few logical decisions are being made. It seems like all efforts are focused on solving some other problems.
Ellie: It seems that the Mudryk case could become a new Bosman case that affects the entire football landscape. It is too murky a situation that no one is trying to explain to us. Let me remind you that back then, Bosman won his case but became a pariah in football and lived in poverty afterwards. I wonder if Mudryk is ready for such a development?
Jay: Again a conspiracy against Chelsea! As soon as the player starts to show himself, suddenly some doping is found! Too suspicious. Why Mudryk? Does someone want to harm Chelsea through one of the most promising players?
Seylor: It's somehow strange that the results of the B sample are not published! It feels like they are waiting for the situation to be forgotten and then quietly disqualify him. Someone wants to weaken Chelsea before crucial matches! Otherwise, why would they even blow up this scandal?
WontMiss: Is this a political order? A Ukrainian footballer, an English club... Someone clearly does not like this combination! And we all suspect who might be behind this. Someone who equally hates both Ukraine and Great Britain.
